Research · data analysis

The East–West cost-of-living divide

Why a litre of normality costs 3.2 times more in Switzerland than in Bulgaria - and what the gap reveals about how European economies are built.

The two ends of Europe's cost spectrum

🇨🇭 Switzerland175🇮🇸 Iceland153🇮🇪 Ireland142🇩🇰 Denmark142🇳🇴 Norway140🇧🇬 Bulgaria55🇷🇴 Romania58🇵🇱 Poland60🇭🇺 Hungary65🇸🇰 Slovakia70

A continent, two price worlds

Set the European Union average at 100 and the spread is startling. At the affordable end sit Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Hungary and Slovakia, where a standardised basket costs roughly half to two-thirds of the EU norm. At the expensive end stand Switzerland, Iceland, Norway, Denmark and Ireland, where the same basket can cost three-quarters more than average, and far more than double what it costs in the Balkans.

The geography is unmistakable. The cheapest economies cluster across Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe, the formerly planned economies of the Baltic, the Carpathian basin and the Balkan peninsula, alongside the Mediterranean south of Greece, Portugal and Spain. The most expensive are concentrated in the Nordic north and the Alpine west: Finland, Sweden, Luxembourg and the German-speaking core. The large western economies - Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Belgium - sit close to the middle, slightly above average.

Why the gap is so wide

The decisive factor is the distinction between tradable goods and non-tradable services. Manufactured products, electronics, vehicles, fuel, branded clothing, move freely across the single market, so their prices converge: a television costs much the same in Sofia as in Stockholm. Services and housing cannot be imported. A haircut, a restaurant meal, a plumber's visit or a month's rent is produced and consumed locally, and its price reflects local wages. Where wages are high, as in Switzerland or Norway, the cost of these non-tradables is bid up, lifting the whole price level. Where wages are lower, as in Bulgaria or Romania, services stay cheap even though the imported goods on the shelves cost the same euros.

Economists call this the Balassa–Samuelson effect, and it explains why prosperity and high prices travel together. Productivity gains concentrate in the export sector; the wages they generate spill into the sheltered, labour-intensive service economy that cannot match those productivity gains; service prices therefore climb with national income. The result is the cliff visible in the chart above, a structural feature of how rich and developing economies differ, not a temporary anomaly.

What the divide does not tell you

It would be a mistake to read the cheap end as uniformly attractive and the expensive end as uniformly punishing. Because high prices accompany high incomes, the expensive countries are not necessarily harder to live in for the people who earn there. A resident of Switzerland faces the continent's steepest prices but also its highest median income; a resident of Bulgaria enjoys the lowest prices but on a much smaller pay packet. The honest measure of living standards is affordability, income weighed against prices, which we analyse separately in where income stretches furthest.

A tour of the spectrum

Travel the price ladder from bottom to top and the economic geography of the continent unfolds. The Balkan and Carpathian economies anchor the affordable base: Bulgaria and Romania sit lowest, trailed closely by Poland, Hungary and Slovakia, where decades of catch-up growth have lifted wages without yet pushing local prices toward the western norm. A rung higher come the Baltic trio, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, joined by Croatia and Czechia, fast-converging economies whose costs are climbing but remain comfortably below the Union average. The Mediterranean south forms a distinct cluster: Greece, Portugal, Spain and Italy combine mild prices with warm climates, a mix that draws pensioners, remote workers and seasonal migrants alike.

Cross into the continental core and the index settles near the benchmark. Slovenia, Cyprus, Estonia and Malta hover just below one hundred; Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Belgium and the Netherlands rise just above it, their large diversified economies pulling them toward the middle. Then the curve steepens sharply. The Nordic and Alpine economies, Finland, Sweden, Austria, Luxembourg, Norway, Denmark, Ireland, Iceland and, at the summit, Switzerland, occupy the expensive frontier, where abundant high-wage employment in finance, pharmaceuticals, energy and technology lifts the price of every local service alongside it. The ascent from Sofia to Zurich is not gradual; it is a near-vertical wall at the wealthy end, the visible signature of how productivity, wages and prices reinforce one another in the richest corners of Europe.

The takeaway

Europe's 3.2× cost spread is real, geographic and structural. If your income is portable, a remote salary, a pension, savings, the eastern and southern economies offer genuine, large gains in spending power, with Bulgaria and its neighbours at the affordable frontier. If you will earn locally, the picture inverts, because the high-cost north and west also pay the highest wages.

Either way, the overall index is the starting point, not the verdict. Housing dominates most budgets and varies even more sharply than the headline figure, so the right next step is the rent ranking and a look at the specific cities you are considering on the cities pages.

Source: Eurostat, comparative price levels (HICP) and median equivalised net income Eurostat, comparative price levels (HICP) and median equivalised net income Price-level indices, EU-27 = 100, 2023.

Data compiled and verified by the PlainCostOfLiving team.